Monday, October 3, 2011

Paradigm Shifts ...

“Thinking inside the box” represents a paradigm which has closed boundaries with constrained options; i.e. “the way it is”.  “Thinking outside the box” represents a paradigm outside with flexible options; i.e. “what it might be”.  Metaphors for the 21st Century focuses on “New ways of Thinking inside and outside the box”.  I feel it is essential to think inside and outside the box paradigms as well as the transition between the paradigms.  This blog focuses on this concept.
A simplified analogy for paradigm is a habit of reasoning, or "the box" in the commonly used phrase "thinking outside the box". Thinking inside the box is analogous with normal science. The box encompasses the thinking of normal science and thus the box is analogous with paradigm. "Thinking outside the box" would be what Kuhn calls revolutionary science. Revolutionary science is usually unsuccessful, and very rarely leads to new paradigms. However, when they are successful they lead to large scale changes in the scientific worldview. When these large scale shifts in the scientific view are implemented and accepted by the majority, it will then become "the box" and science will progress within it.”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm extract.
The “Focus on Paradigm Shifts …” shows the shift of Paradigm A to Paradigm B and Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Concept.  The spiral in the center represents the processes that are involved with taking the input on the left and creating an output on the right with resources from the bottom.

“The Focus on Paradigm Shift Venn Diagram …” examines the paradigms and processes using the Venn diagram concept. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram discusses Venn diagrams in detail. Tools such as SmartDraw can be used to create Venn Diagrams and other graphical communication visuals.
As you can see the current paradigm “A” and future paradigm “B” have overlap processes “C”.  Note “D” represents areas of paradigms that are common to both.  Current paradigm processes “E” and Future paradigms processes “F” have processes “G” that are common to both. Use of Venn diagrams is a tool for analyzing what needs to change and what needs to remain the same in the paradigm shift.


The “Focus on Dilts Leadership …” chart is a diagram from the book “Visionary Leadership Skills: Creating a World to Which People Want to Belong” by Robert Dilts.  As I recall his work is based on Gregory Bateson’s work. 


The “Focus on bcXX Paradigm Shift Chart …” is based on these levels of thinking from Dilt’s chart. It illustrates “Egypt” to “Promised Land” paradigm shifts and associated levels of Micro, Macro and Meta thinking. Kessels & Smit document describes the levels from Gregory Bateson and Robert Dilt’s work in a corporate coach context.  My chart above is based on the Dilt’s chart modified for work in the context of paradigm shifts.  Note some of the work starts with the lowest level in Paradigm A and examines it in an upward manner, once reaching the top it examines Paradigm B in a downward manner.  This approach is useful in thinking through the various levels associated with Paradigm shifts and complements the Venn diagram approach.  Some of the psychological treatments uses this up-down approach to align the clients thinking.   
As discussed in Blog May 24, 2011 Blog New Ways of Thinking Inside and Outside the Box …”.  Several years ago I read a book discussing Paradigm Shifts; in it the concepts of Visionary, Leader and Administrator paradigms were discussed. The author emphasized that a Leader is one that has the ability to move from one paradigm to another. This is what is being attempted to be depicted in the chart.’

Your challenge is to answer the question in " Focus on Your Paradigm ..."!
=================
Post Script October 4, 2010
After writing and posting this blog, I awakened in the middle of the night wondering if the concepts discussed in this blog could be used to understand the events of major paradigm shifts such as the 2011 Arab Spring, Occupy Wall Street, etc.  Included below is extracts from Wikipedia related to these two paradigm shifts.  Please look at the chart that shows Paradigm A – Egypt moving to Paradigm B – Promised Land.

------------------

The Wikipedia Arab Spring article gives information this event.

“Motivations
Numerous factors have led to the protests, including issues such as dictatorship or absolute monarchy, human rights violations, government corruption (demonstrated by Wikileaks diplomatic cables),[139] economic decline, unemployment, extreme poverty, and a number of demographic structural factors,[140] such as a large percentage of educated but dissatisfied youth within the population.[141] Also, some attribute the 2009 Iranian protests as one of the reasons behind the Arab Spring.[142] The catalysts for the revolts in all Northern African and Persian Gulf countries have been the concentration of wealth in the hands of autocrats in power for decades, insufficient transparency of its redistribution, corruption, and especially the refusal of the youth to accept the status quo.[143] Increasing food prices and global famine rates have also been a significant factor, as they involve threats to food security worldwide and prices that approach levels of the 2007–2008 world food price crisis.[144] Amnesty International singled out Wikileaks release of US diplomatic cables as a catalyst for the revolts.[145]
In recent decades rising living standards and literacy rates, as well as the increased availability of higher education, have resulted in an improved human development index in the affected countries. The tension between rising aspirations and a lack of government reform may have been a contributing factor in all of the protests.[143][146][147] Many of the internet-savvy youth of these countries have studied in the West, where autocrats and absolute monarchies are considered anachronisms. A university professor of Oman, Al-Najma Zidjaly referred to this upheaval as youthquake.[143]
Tunisia and Egypt, the first to witness major uprisings, differ from other North African and Middle Eastern nations such as Algeria and Libya in that they lack significant oil revenue, and were thus unable to make concessions to calm the masses.[143]  
----------
This Wikipedia Occupy Wall Street Article discusses this event.

“Background

After the late-2000s recession that left many countries on the edge of bankruptcy, with weakened economies and unemployment at very high levels, a Canadian-based group, the Adbusters Media Foundation, best known for its advertisement-free anti-consumerist magazine called Adbusters, proposed a peaceful occupation of Wall Street in protest against the current U.S. political leadership and the failure to prevent or make effective changes regarding the global financial crisis. According to the senior editor of the magazine, “[they] basically floated the idea in mid-July into our [email list] and it was spontaneously taken up by all the people of the world, it just kind of snowballed from there.”[16]
Although it was originally proposed by Adbusters magazine, the demonstration is leaderless.[17] Activists from Anonymous encouraged its followers to take part in the protest, which increased the attention it received.[7] Other groups followed, including the NYC General Assembly and U.S. Day of Rage.[11] The protests have brought together people of many political positions.
Prior to the protest's beginning on September 17, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg said in a press conference, "People have a right to protest, and if they want to protest, we'll be happy to make sure they have locations to do it."[11] 

Thank you for reading this blog, hopefully it will give you better understanding of Paradigm Shifts.




Tuesday, May 24, 2011

New Ways of Thinking Inside and Outside the Box ….

I have used Metaphors for the 21st Century (M21C) to promote "New ways of thinking inside & outside the box" for a number of years.  The M21C cap has been an effective way to get people's  attention, they ask "What is M21C?"  This has given me an opportunity to give them a business card and share thinking which is documented in my blogs.
This blog uses Design Funnels to express a new concept of thinking inside and outside the box. 
 
Thinking Phase Views was an early version of the Design Funnel thinking in the context of Fish-Hook-Fry and parallels the Research-Development-Production-Marketplace concepts of M21C.  It was an attempt to show how Degrees of Freedom start wide and then narrow as the product is attained. 

It evolved from ideas of Outward thinking of creativity to Inward needs met focus.  To effectively make the transition from Outward to Inward thinking Critical thinking comes into play.
This chart evolved from a discussion of Truth to represent differing viewpoints of Truth. The three viewpoints developed separately via Outward, Critical, Inward Focus thinking. An example is the three Abrahamic religions: Jewish, Christian, Islam, they all claim historical ties to Abraham. Another example is the Political viewpoints of Conservative, Liberal, etc. Looking at it from a Technology viewpoint Microsoft, Apple, Google Products and Services different in their implementation.


Expanding on the Truth Thinking this chart shows slices of the 3 Design Funnels Viewpoints.  This slice corresponds to the previous chart comparing design funnels.  Also shown is Fiction which is outside the Whole Truth sphere. 


The chart below “New Ways of Thinking Inside & Outside the Box” is an outgrowth of Design Funnel Thinking.  The “A” box depicts Visionary which has a large degree of freedom; “C” box represents Administrator with small degree of freedom and “B” encompasses both and transition between them.  The Blue, Red and Green arrows depict Design Funnels at various stages of development.  These could represent products or idea viewpoints.  “C” would be a limited viewpoint or mature Red product. The Blue and Green are developing products or viewpoints.
Several years ago I read a book discussing Paradigm Shifts; in it the concepts of Visionary, Leader and Administrator paradigms were discussed.  The author emphasized that a Leader is one that has the ability to move from one paradigm to another.  This is what is being attempted to be depicted in the chart.
Revisiting the chart note our thinking sphere can be depicted by the box that is more like us.  Communication problems are prone to evolve when they are thinking in different boxes, e.g., “A” and “C” will have completely different points of reference.  When both move to the “B” box they should be in a better position to appreciate the others viewpoints.

Hopefully this blog be helpful to readers in new ways of thinking inside and outside the box.  Feedback is welcomed.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

What Grows an Economy? …. PIE? ….. X-Factor?

The “What Grows an Economy?”  article in the November 22, 2010 Forbes issue  by Rich Karlgaard has some very interesting information which I find gives validity to the concept of planting PIE Teams.

He points out that “Since World War II the U.S. economy has averaged 3.3% GDP growth year. …. Right now the U.S. is in a “growth recession,” which we can define as statistical growth but at a subpar rate.”

It further points out “Carl Schramm, who heads America’s top entrepreneurial think tank, the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, has a stunningly good insight into what causes an economy to grow. Growth, he says, correlates directly with startups that get big. …. He is quoted in an interview with Rich Karlgaard “The single most important contributor to a nation’s economic growth is the number of startups that grow to a billion dollars in revenue within 20 years.” He indicates the U.S. needs to spawn 75-125 billion-dollar babies every year in order to feed the country’s post WWII rate of growth.

This triggered in my mind the importance of planting Entrepreneur Productive Innovative Engines (PIE) Teams in our schools and jobless networks. In my previous blogs I discuss the concept of PIE Teams in:

     • Create Job Opportunities with PIE
     • Wanted Economy With Motor

     • Quality White Glove

Mr. Schramm states the “X factor” is startups that get big.

I suggest if we want to solve the problem of Jobs and a slow economy, we need policies that encourage PIE Teams to experiment with creating new products and services that have the potential for growing into big companies i.e., X factor effect.

The concept of Entrepreneur Productive Innovative Engine (PIE) Teams is that they are planted in Schools. Jobless Networks and within Industry as potential spin offs that will get those participating into a frame of mind of creating products and services that will result in new jobs.  In Industry these Teams may be called "Skunk Works."

A Team consists of the following Hats:
  - Business (Entrepreneur)
  - Customer (Marketplace
  - Technologist (Production/Service)
  - Engineer (Design & Development)
  - Scientist (Research)
  - Logistics (Global Supply Chain

These are discussed in detail in blogs at http://www.bcswonline.com/blog/index.html.

Hopefully these thoughts will be useful in getting the pipe-line primed for the X-factor companies that will be needed in the next 20 years.  Other thoughts regarding this concept are welcomed.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Design Funnel ... Fish-Hook-Fry Metaphors ....

In my research and study using the latest versions of Microsoft Expression Studio and Visual Studio, I have been impressed with how they have treated the design and development area. In the book “Dynamic Prototyping with Sketch Flow in Expression Blend” by Chris Bernard & Sara Summers QUE c 2010 there is a nice chart shown here that does a good job of presenting the gap between design and development. It fits well with other thinking as discussed in blogs at http://www.bcswonline.com/blog/index.html.

In the http://bcswonline.blogspot.com/2008/03/innovation-customer.html blog the ISCORPIO Metaphor was introduced with emphasis on Innovation and Customer. Also in that blog a diagram of “Thinking Phase Views” ( shown below) was described that shows degrees of freedom of innovation beginning wide with outward thinking, then progressing to critical and then inward as the solution options become narrowly defined. This metaphor of the “Fish-Hook-Fry” was an early metaphor thinking that illustrates this narrowing of the degrees of freedom in the innovation development process.

A PDF file showing the two charts with notes is available at http://bcswonline.com/blog/DesignFunnelFishHookFryNotes.pdf. Comparing the two charts in the mid area where “Miracles Occur Here!!!” and “Critical – Understand” relate to similar areas in the Design Funnel. To the left of Critical “Outward” would correspond to “Ideation (Sketching)” and to the right of “Inward” would correspond to “Usability (Prototyping)”. Beneficial insights can be gleamed from reflection on both charts.

In the http://bcswonline.blogspot.com/2009/10/i-stem.html  blog, I proposed we should add Imagination and Innovation to STEM and call it “I-STEM”. This was expanded on in http://bcswonline.blogspot.com/2009/12/cte-i-stem-cookie.html and blog http://bcswonline.blogspot.com/2010/06/i-in-i-stem.html  references

Triad Design Leadershop website which documents the concept of Create – Change as conducted by five heavy hitters in the Creative Design area.

• David Rose – Designer of Tactile and Environmentally Aware Devices

• Bill Grant – Designer of Business and brand Experiences "Design is more than Decorating"

• Claudia Kotchka – Change Agent and Design Evangelist

• Jason Manley – Interactive Media and Game Designer

• David Adjaye & Phil Freelon – Innovative Architects of Public Sector Spaces

It appears these illustrations speak quite well to the concept of “I” in my blogs on “I-STEM” and “CTE-I-STEM Cookie”.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Quality - White Glove ...

Quality – White Glove ….


This blog is a companion to http://bcswonline.blogspot.com/2010/08/create-job-opportunities-with-pie.html. It introduced the idea of Productive Innovative Engine (PIE) Team Players as represented by fingers, each of the fingers and arm is focused on the creation of a product or service.

This blog brings the concept of Quality to bear on the PIE Team.

The following definition of Quality came to me in the 1990s when I was teaching at NCA&T.

“Quality comes from Ownership with Integrity and appropriate Resources in a healthy Paradigm – lhb”

Note, that an “O” and an “I” make a “Q”. At first I started with Ownership, Integrity and appropriate Resources, but after thinking about it, realized that you could have Ownership, Integrity and appropriate Resources, but not necessarily have Quality. When you have an environment that is at cross purposes and discourage things working compatible together, that is not a healthy paradigm and Quality suffers.

This concept of Quality has been robust and has been accepted by many as the essential ingredients of Quality. It does not supersede other Quality concepts but complements them.

While reading “Skunk Works” by Ben Rich & Leo Janos, and thinking about the recent BP Oil Spill Disaster and the Space Shuttle Disaster, it triggered me to include Quality as an integral part of the PIE Team. Quality has always been a part of PIE Team thinking but is not quite as evident as needed.

I propose in this blog to add a second hand with a white glove that brings to bear quality described above. In Military Inspections the white glove inspection was a way of determining if the barracks was clean.

When you think of the white glove, which also has five fingers they stress the importance of various types of quality that is normal in industry. It also places emphasis on having appropriate resources such as financial, skills, tools, processes, facilities, best practices, etc. Creating a culture for a healthy paradigm is a primary function of the Quality hand. The Quality Hand must be vested with competence and authority to over ride poor decisions made by the PIE Team. In other words Safety and Quality must not be pre-empted by schedule or profit drivers.

ISO 9000 standards are responsibility of PIE Team and White Glove Team.

Maybe the concept of PIE Team Finger metaphor and white glove working together will result in a Creative/Innovative Quality Product/Service. It is worth thinking about.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Wanted: Economy with a motor ...

In today's News & Record there is a headline "Wanted: Economy with a motor".  In the graphic below it shows this headline along with two views of PIE Team and the workforce by skill level.

As was discussed in the previous blog "Create-Job-Opportunities-with-PIE" the concept of planting Productive Innovative Engines (PIE) in the schools and jobless networks was presented.  It also discusses the Hats vs Fingers Metaphor.

In the report "Tough Choices or Tough Times" power point slide 8 shows a graphic "Profile of Successful U. S. Firms in the Future."  A modified version is shown at the left with relative salaries for various levels of the workforce; it also has the creative work emphasized.  It depicts a diamond area of creative work which is very similar to the PIE Team as discussed in several of my blogs



A modified version shows the profile of work types also with relative salaries.  In addition Creative Work, this chart shows Operations Work, Outsourced Work and routine work that has been Automated.
In the Worker Displacement Chart, it depicts various types of worker displacement by:
  • Automation
  • Outsourcing
  • Inadequate Resources
  • Failed Company

In addition it shows that there are worker jobs that were created by Automation.

PIE Teams are a potential answer to the headline "Wanted: Economy with a motor."  In other words PIE Teams and other concepts are discussed in my blogs which present new ways of thinking inside and outside of the box.

By planting PIE Teams in Schools and Jobless Networks they:
  • Perform Creative Work
  • Create Products/Services
  • Create Operations Jobs
  • Automate Bad Jobs
  • Outsource non-competitive Jobs
  • Provide a Competitive Edge.
I welcome feedback to the concepts and suggestions discussed in this blog and other blogs.

Saturday, August 7, 2010

Create Job Opportunities with PIE ...

We hear Jobs, Jobs, Jobs; we need jobs. This blog brings to the table a view that we must have a proactive approach to creation of jobs.

Drawing on Metaphors from M21C thinking, the concept of planting PIE Teams is a proactive way to get people thinking about the primary functions that create Things and therefore Jobs. The graphic expresses this with emphasis on hands and fingers. A new metaphor for the six hat team is presented using the fingers of a hand and the arm.
Earlier thinking had been to plant PIE in Schools but later thinking focuses on also planting PIE in the Jobless Networking groups. Rather than calling it Pre-college Innovative Engines (PIE), maybe we should call it Productive Innovative Engines (PIE) which would apply to Schools as well as Jobless Networking groups. Both would benefit from PIE Team thinking.

In the previous metaphor of a PIE Team, a room was used with the Entrepreneur (Business Hat) in the center and four corners representing the Marketplace (Customer Hat), Production/Service (Technologist Hat), Design/Development (Engineer Hat) and Research (Scientist Hat). The hall represents Global Supply Chain (Logistics Hat) which connects rooms together with channel for flow of supplies and goods between rooms. The Entrepreneur (Business Hat) manages the resources of all hats toward a productive, efficient and profitable enterprise.

Recent thinking has evolved another metaphor which uses the fingers of the hand and arm to denote another view of the PIE Team. In the hand graphic the PIE Team is represented by the fingers as follows:

• Thumb – Business (Entrepreneur)

• Index – Customer (Marketplace)

• Middle – Technologist (Production/Service)

• Ring – Engineer (Design & Development)

• Little – Scientist (Research)

• Arm – Logistics (Global Supply Chain) – Moves Stuff

Bringing all five fingers together is the PIE Team. This metaphor gives flexibility to show the Business – Entrepreneur (Thumb) interacting with the other fingers either individually as shown by the thumb and index holding a product that is of interest to the Marketplace. In other cases it may be focusing on the Production/Service, Design & Development and Research. In this metaphor the arm is the Logistics which moves stuff in the global supply chain. One thing to note, the focus shifts dependent on the product development cycle.

In one of the videos of Partners for the 21st century education there is a young person that says "I am learning my fingers are the gateway to my future."  She is probably thinking of a musical instrument but the words also apply to the PIE Team Fingers Metaphor.

Recently when I was sharing this PIE Team concept with Dr. Margaret Arbuckle - Guilford Education Alliance and Mr. George Clopton - Polo Ralph Lauren, George said it sounds like the “Skunk Works”. I had not thought about it like that but it does fit. I suspect they had PIE Teams in the Skunk works”.

Wikipedia cites “Skunk Works is an official alias for Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Development Programs (ADP), formerly called Lockheed Advanced Development Projects. Skunk Works is responsible for a number of famous aircraft designs, including the U-2, the SR-71 Blackbird, the F-117 Nighthawk, and the F-22 Raptor. Its largest current project is the F-35 Lightning II, which will be used in the air forces of several countries around the world. Production is expected to last for up to four decades.

The designation "skunk works", or "skunkworks", is widely used in business, engineering, and technical fields to describe a group within an organization given a high degree of autonomy and unhampered by bureaucracy, tasked with working on advanced or secret projects”

More information is available at “Skunk works”.

In the graphic of all hands out represents PIE Teams working together to create Jobs in an enterprise environment.

I summit this to the table which is thinking about how to best create jobs. It may not create the jobs immediately but would provide a strong position for future product development that requires people with appropriate skills and entrepreneurial thinking from being part of a PIE Team.

Post Script 12/7/2010
Continued thinking of the PIE Team hand metaphor today expands the palm to include the following:
  • Products, Processes and Service   (Triggered by "What Grows an Economy" blog)
  • Appropriate Resources
  • Skill Sets & I-STEM
Appropriate Resources and Skill Sets & I-STEM are mashed together to get the appropriate Products, Processes or Service solutions.

Adding the palm strengthens the PIE Team Metaphor.  Feedback is welcome.